Someone at Southwest thought that they should cover up the no-smoking sign on the bottom of the seat back tray with a big plastic Southwest Logo sticker. I am so amused by this:(1) Did they decide that there has been no-smoking in planes long enough that they no longer need the "posted placard"
(2) Is the Southwest logo supposed to improve the planes aesthetics? Or is it a marketing strategy?
(3) Who had to put them on the seats in the plane? Did the workers complain that it wasn't their job to affix stickers?
(4) In this cost-cutting economy who decided that this was an investment worth making?
4 comments:
I am as amused as you. Further:
Who did the cost analysis that it was cheaper to do stickers than replace the whole lid?
What is the life expectency of the sticker?
Wonder if a terrorist could move seat to seat and take the sticker off
I'm going to be very tempted to try and peel this sticker off in a few weeks...what else is there to do besides the Southwest magazine and Skymall?
I wish someone would submit a cost-benefit proposal to AA to remove the no-smoking light that is next to the fasten seat belt one. How much electricity/money must they lose on that stupid thing? planes have definitely been non-smoking long enough to remove that crap.
I think the sticker is there for those people who fall asleep and jerk themselves awake and wonder where they are.... Now they can know "oh, I'm on Southwest, whew, guess I'll have a smoke..."
Post a Comment